[rrd-developers] Re: NT Version of 1.1-dev code

[Ian Holsman]

Peter Stamfest wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Ian Holsman wrote:
> 

> What do you think about the overall design of the thread-safety stuff? Did 
> it provide for all that was needed to get you going on win32? What could 
> be improved?

I haven't really started pushing the thread-safety stuff yet.
the only thing I could have used API'wise is a application_init/application_term
call so I could put the global initialization stuff in, but I don't think RRD actually
has this, so I had to resort to calling the init function every call (just like your pthread 
implementation calls pthread_once every call).

(the next step for me is to get the perl-interface working, as it was crashing for me on linux, and 
I like the NT Debugger/IDE better)

ps.. I don't think the NT version of localtime is re-entrant, as you can't pass a block of assigned 
memory to it.

--Ian
> 
> peter
> 
> 
> 


--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi