[rrd-developers] Re: RANGE style

[Alex van den Bogaerdt]

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:48:32PM +0900, Susumu Shimizu wrote:

> Isn't it much straightforward? 

Maybe so.  Then again, maybe not.


I think the question should be made more abstract:

For "n" different type of graphs do we

1) define "p" different grapher functions, where p equals n

or

2) combine "q" different grapher functions, where q is much
   smaller than n yet we may need to use more than one function


Personally I'd vote for option 2.  Much smaller documentation,
much smaller program, much less chance for bugs.

cheers,
Alex
-- 
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi