[rrd-users] Re: RRDTool Installation Problem

[Scheidel, Greg]

I pulled down RRDTool v1.0.10 (before I had v1.0.9) and oddly enough, it
automatically guessed i586-pc-linux-gnu by itself, without having to be
forced.

> Define "all"?!  Here's what I get with v1.0.10 on rh6.0...

Here's the 'suspicious' messages that I get from configure v1.0.10:
# configure --enable-shared
checking for working aclocal... missing
checking for working autoconf... missing
checking for working automake... missing
checking for working autoheader... missing
checking for working makeinfo... missing
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking for executable suffix... (cached) no
checking for fp_class.h... (cached) no
checking for fpclass... (cached) no
checking for class... (cached) no
checking for fpclassify... (cached) no
checking for fp_class... (cached) no

Most of these look like generic "Hi, I'm checking to see how to build the
make file" messages, but I'm paranoid enough to wonder what impact each of
these will have.

?

Greg S.

-----Original Message-----
From: steve rader [mailto:rader at teak.wiscnet.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 4:25 PM
To: Scheidel, Greg
Subject: Re: [rrd-users] Re: RRDTool Installation Problem 

 > From: "Scheidel, Greg"
 > The only other option that I had besides  "i586-pc-linux-gnuaout" was
 > "i586-pc-linux-gnucoff".  What exactly is the difference between the two?

coff is another old/odd/goofy binary executable format. 

I think you should use

  i586-pc-linux-gnu

After all, that's what my working rrdtool builds on about four
versions of redhat use.  =:)

steve

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users