[rrd-users] Re: overhead of value

[Cliff Savage]

At 11:04 AM 8/3/01 -0700, you wrote:

> > I have a problema to display date over 120Mb on Gigaethernet ports.
>
>You are using regular Interface counters rather than the 64-bit counters
>when you are gathering your data to insert it into the RRD. In MRTG you
>just have to specify that you want to use SNMP v2 and it will
>automatically use the HC counters.

I wonder if this holds true if you are trying to graph % used and
absolute bytes used ( 2 separate graphs) on a big hard drive.
I'm trying to graph these things on a 40GB drive and would like
to have it correct B4 I switch the disk usage graphs over to RRD.
Or does it simply depend on the size of hr.StorageAllocationUnits ?
Perhaps SNMP v1 versus SNMP v2 is completely immaterial to
this situation?

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi