[rrd-users] Re: Graph problem when using a more complicated CDEF
Alex van den Bogaerdt
alex at ergens.op.het.net
Wed Apr 16 01:08:13 MEST 2003
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 09:51:32PM +0200, Bas Rijniersce wrote:
> I want to plot an area memtot and stack swaptot on it
> Over that i draw a line2 of (swaptot-swapfree)+(memtot-memfree)
[...]
> As a test I used CDEF:memuse=memtot,memfree,- on the stacked areas, that
> worked fine. But when I change the statement to:
> CDEF:memuse=memfree,swapfree,memtot,swaptot,+,-,-
Process the function when you put them on the stack:
push memfree: memfree -> no action
push swapfree: memfree,swapfree -> no action
push memtot: memfree,swapfree,memtot -> no action
push swaptot: memfree,swapfree,memtot,swaptot -> no action
push +: memfree,swapfree,memtot,swaptot,+ -> pull two values, add, push back
result: memfree,swapfree,result1 where result1 ::= memtot+swaptot
push -: memfree,swapfree,result1,- -> pull two values, subtract, push back
result: memfree,result2 where result2 ::= swapfree-result1
push -: memfree,result2,- -> pull two, subtract, push
end result: result3 where result3 ::= memfree-result2
Your CDEF does: memfree-(swapfree-(memtot+swaptot))
which is memfree-(swapfree-memtot-swaptot)
which is memfree-swapfree+memtot+swaptot
which is: memtot+swaptot + memfree - swapfree
whereas you want: memtot+swaptot - memfree - swapfree
Your function into CDEF:
(swaptot-swapfree)+(memtot-memfree)
First things first; between brackets:
result1 swaptot,swapfree,-
result2 memtot,memfree,-
Then the addition:
result1,result2,+
complete CDEF when substituted:
swaptot,swapfree,-,memtot,memfree,-,+
Other calculation, same result:
You want: (memtot+swaptot) - (memfree+swapfree)
memtot,swaptot,+,memfree,swapfree,+,-
You want: (memtot+swaptot) - (memfree+swapfree)
this is: memtot+swaptot - memfree - swapfree
memtot,swaptot,+,memfree,-,swapfree,-
You want: (memtot+swaptot) - (memfree+swapfree)
this is: memtot - memfree + swaptot - swapfree
memtot,memfree,-,swaptot,+,swapfree,-
As you can see: a,b,- means (a-b)
NOTE: I didn't verify my results. If there is an error or an ommision,
just read past it and try to see the big picture. I need no lectures.
This is not intended for the poster of *this* question by the way.
HTH
Alex
--
Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give
offence. Rather, it's the product of the direct, cut-through-the-bullshit
communications style that is natural to people who are more concerned about
solving problems than making others feel warm and fuzzy.
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the rrd-users
mailing list