[rrd-users] Re: How does rrdtool behave if I store 5-minute-values for one year?
serge.maandag at staff.zeelandnet.nl
Thu Jan 30 15:41:15 MET 2003
> So the consolidation is just good for saving disk space?
Yes, at least that's the only reason I know.
> Am I right, that I would just have to keep 1-year 5-minute-values and
I can also get the cf MAX out of it?
Almost, if you want average values and max values, you need both an
AVERAGE and a MAX rra in you rrd database.
From: Stephan Harren [mailto:sh at abovenet.de]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:29 PM
To: Serge Maandag; rrd-users at list.ee.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [rrd-users] How does rrdtool behave if I store
5-minute-values for one year?
Am I right, that I would just have to keep 1-year 5-minute-values and I
also get the cf MAX out of it?
Am Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2003 13:48 schrieb Serge Maandag:
> rrdtool uses the values the rrd holds. For the given time frame you
> to graph, it will try to take the highest resolution data.
> If you just store 5 minute samples, it will never even think of using
> 2 hours average.
> 2 hours average samples can only be displayed if your rrd database has
> an RRA that averages over 2 hours.
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
More information about the rrd-users