[rrd-users] Re: MAX doesn't work as expected: peaks are filtered
rrd-users01 at ghezzi.net
Tue Aug 17 16:00:07 MEST 2004
If I got it right, the way MAX/MIN works is a design decision then. Why
was it so hard to say so?
I still don't see why it should be wrong or hard to keep the actual
max/min value instead of just an average, and I'm not willing to dig the
mail archives searching for the answer tha Alex is keeping to himself,
so I will just accept things as they are and adopt a workaround.
Thank you for your time.
My comments were intended to help make rrdtool better (from my point of
view of course). I don't see why Alex is taking this matter so
personally. "The difference between you and me", dear Alex, should not
matter to this mailing list, and it sure doesn't matter to me.
Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:09:51PM +0200, Cristian Ghezzi wrote:
>>I find this misleading. Doesn't anybody agree? Don't you think this
>>could be easily changed, so to produce exact values for MAX/MIN also?
>Well, you know, the difference between you and me is that I was a user
>of rrdtool, and a participant on this list, way back when Tobi decided
>that indeed it was not possible to produce exact values for MAX and MIN.
>I was there when the program changed to do exactly the opposite of what
>you want. Not because it would misled you but because it used to do so.
>But I promised myself I wouldn't respond to top-quoters anymore; thanks
>for the reminder of why I did that!
>Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
>Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
More information about the rrd-users