[rrd-users] Re: Advanced CDEF Question
Alex van den Bogaerdt
alex at ergens.op.het.net
Thu May 27 11:40:34 MEST 2004
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 02:03:47PM -0600, Dayton Turner wrote:
> Anyways, Ive got this working, using the CDEF
> a,b,+,c,+,d,+,1024,*,8,* (to change to bits and mult by 1024)
that 2nd eight is a typo. Yes, this looks good, except then NaN
Are you putting those parentheses in for real? You shouldn't.
For readability I'd define two CDEFs and use those in the 3rd:
> When i look at the graph in graph debug mode, It just shows a broken
> graph, and "RRDtool Says: "
> Normally it would say OK, or if there was an error, spit out what the
> error was. This is obviously making it hard to debug.
That is a front end not doing its job I guess.
I ask you to respect any "Reply-To" and "Mail-Follow-Up" headers. If
you reply to me off-list, you'd better tell me you're doing so. If
you don't, and if I reply to the list, that's your problem, not mine.
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
More information about the rrd-users