[rrd-users] Re: Advanced CDEF Question

[Alex van den Bogaerdt]

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 11:01:41AM -0600, Dayton Turner wrote:

> > Are you putting those parentheses in for real?  You shouldn't.
> 
> Yes I was putting those parentheses in for real. Can you tell me why  
> that is not supposed to work? I ask because, as you point out later, i  

More important: can *you* tell me why it *is* supposed to work.

>          and currently as far as i know, Cacti will only allow me to  
> use one CDEF per graph item, which is why, I presume, it tried to  
> create a big long CDEF out of parentheses instead of split it across 3  
> separate CDEFs.

Having one big CDEF is not wrong.  It is hard to debug, that's all.

Alex
-- 
I ask you to respect any "Reply-To" and "Mail-Follow-Up" headers.  If
you reply to me off-list, you'd better tell me you're doing so.  If
you don't, and if I reply to the list, that's your problem, not mine.

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi