[rrd-users] Re: Showing a longer timeframe on a graph

[Alex van den Bogaerdt]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 08:57:13AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Two weeks in the past, minus 300 seconds (why ?!?), means 14*86400-300 seconds.
> > Each pixel column should display 300 seconds, so your graph needs to be
> > (14*86400-300)/300 pixels wide.  Good luck.
> 
> That was a hypothetical example. Let's say I want 3 days "width" at the 5
> minute resolution. The same question still applies. Do I have to resort to
> "walking" along the graph in daily increments so as not to get
> consolidation?

How can you display more than one interval in one pixel-column without
doing some kind of consolidation ?!?

Indeed, you can't.

So, if you want to see a 5 minute resolution, you cannot display more
than 5 minutes times the amount of pixels on the X-axis.

Alex
-- 
You want an answer?  You'd better follow the following guidelines!
Linesize well below 80 chars. Reply to the list, not to me. Trim
irrelevant lines. Reply _below_ the relevant lines, not on top.

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi