[rrd-users] Re: Showing a longer timeframe on a graph

[Andrew Pollock]

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:44:03AM +0200, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:00:59AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> 
> > I've made a new RRA definition for 5 minute average, which rather than
> > keeping only 600 rows, keeps 8640 rows (the objective being to retain 30
> > days worth of data at a 5 minute resolution).
> > 
> > I would have thought that by specifying a start to rrdgraph that was say 2
> > weeks into the past, up until 300 seconds ago (one polling interval), would
> 
> > So how can I use rrdgraph to get a "wider" graph, where no consolidation
> > occurs?
> 
> Two weeks in the past, minus 300 seconds (why ?!?), means 14*86400-300 seconds.
> Each pixel column should display 300 seconds, so your graph needs to be
> (14*86400-300)/300 pixels wide.  Good luck.

That was a hypothetical example. Let's say I want 3 days "width" at the 5
minute resolution. The same question still applies. Do I have to resort to
"walking" along the graph in daily increments so as not to get
consolidation?

regards

Andrew

-- 
linux.conf.au 2005   -  http://lca2005.linux.org.au/  -  Birthplace of Tux
April 18th to 23rd   -  http://lca2005.linux.org.au/  -       LINUX
Canberra, Australia  -  http://lca2005.linux.org.au/  -    Get bitten!

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi