[rrd-users] Re: [Fwd: Re: Re: Excluding UNKN or NAN from CDEF]
Eric_Mailing_List at rednarb.com
Mon Sep 27 22:19:47 MEST 2004
Stephan Harren wrote:
> Unknowns ARE ignored when calculating, so try not to use the "use 0
> instead of NaN"-Statements:
> But I guess, this will probably also have some disadvantages, because
> calculating with NaNs can lead to strange effects. Giv it a try, but I'd
> also prefer to use the "cleaned" version.
This, I think, has produced ideal results IMHO. Thank you very much for
your explanation and for writing it out for me. That helped a lot in
having it make sense!
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
More information about the rrd-users