[rrd-users] Re: Timestamp issue?

[Rene Fritzsche]

Hi..

> > However, if I change the start timestamps to 1000000000 or greater, i.e.
> No.  If you change timestamps to be not n*300 you get this effect.  Try
> 1000000200, and try 999998900.
> (n.b. it really is n*stepsize, not n*300)

that may be understandable, if he would only try to fill in data at timestamps not beeing n*stepsize 
into a given database which starts at n*stepsize ... but he accordingly changed the start timestamp
of the db.. 

this means, rrdtool is unable to change the "start timestamp" and use this as base for the update-
process? it seems to be impossible to use a different steptime than "n*stepsize+0" .. and this should
be changed to "n*stepsize+starttime" ...

Is it an error or a feature?

Cu Rene.
-- 




______________________________________________________________________________
"Ein Herz für Kinder" - Ihre Spende hilft! Aktion: www.deutschlandsegelt.de
Unser Dankeschön: Ihr Name auf dem Segel der 1. deutschen America's Cup-Yacht!

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-users
WebAdmin    http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi