[rrd-users] Re: differing disk i/o behavior for rrd update

Tobias Oetiker oetiker at ee.ethz.ch
Tue Feb 28 20:05:58 MET 2006


Hi Christian,

I guess they will both be using mmap at least als long as it is the
same binary ... (mmap or not is a compiletime decision) ...

in gprof output you will see how much time is spent in which
function ...

cheers
tobi

Today Christian Smyth wrote:

> > I do unfortunately not have much gprof experiance myself ...
>
> Tobi,
>
> No problemo.  I will have a look and see what I can do.
>
> However, can you please indicate to me what you are looking for in the
> gprof output?  Are you looking for oldbox's rrdtool to be not using
> mmap(), while newbox's is?  Or something else?  If you give me a general
> idea of what particular needle I am hunting for, I can possibly process
> this haystack a bit more quickly :-)
>
> -cls
>

-- 
 ______    __   _
/_  __/_  / /  (_) Oetiker @ ISG.EE, ETL F24.2, ETH, CH-8092 Zurich
 / // _ \/ _ \/ /  System Manager, Time Lord, Coder, Designer, Coach
/_/ \.__/_.__/_/   http://people.ee.ethz.ch/oetiker +41(0)44-632-5286

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-users
WebAdmin    http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi



More information about the rrd-users mailing list