[rrd-users] Re: differing disk i/o behavior for rrd update
Tobias Oetiker
oetiker at ee.ethz.ch
Tue Feb 28 20:05:58 MET 2006
Hi Christian,
I guess they will both be using mmap at least als long as it is the
same binary ... (mmap or not is a compiletime decision) ...
in gprof output you will see how much time is spent in which
function ...
cheers
tobi
Today Christian Smyth wrote:
> > I do unfortunately not have much gprof experiance myself ...
>
> Tobi,
>
> No problemo. I will have a look and see what I can do.
>
> However, can you please indicate to me what you are looking for in the
> gprof output? Are you looking for oldbox's rrdtool to be not using
> mmap(), while newbox's is? Or something else? If you give me a general
> idea of what particular needle I am hunting for, I can possibly process
> this haystack a bit more quickly :-)
>
> -cls
>
--
______ __ _
/_ __/_ / / (_) Oetiker @ ISG.EE, ETL F24.2, ETH, CH-8092 Zurich
/ // _ \/ _ \/ / System Manager, Time Lord, Coder, Designer, Coach
/_/ \.__/_.__/_/ http://people.ee.ethz.ch/oetiker +41(0)44-632-5286
--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-users
WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
More information about the rrd-users
mailing list