[rrd-users] Additional "Unknown"-Value
n1LL3
Christian.Michel at it-novum.com
Wed Jun 10 14:00:09 CEST 2009
Alex van den Bogaerdt-5 wrote:
>
> I think I understand what you want to achieve. If I may summarize:
>
> * you want the ability to fill a relatively large amount of time with some
> known rate, meaning you want to be able to skip several updates and still
> provide a known rate
> * you also want the ability to hardcode "U" into your data, to signal that
> you know you don't know. That U should stay visible.
>
> An extreme case:
> step size: 1 second
> X-Files Factor: 0.0
> amount of PDPs per CDP: 300
> heartbeat 86400
>
> As long as one update occurs within 86400 seconds (one day) you will get
> 288
> rows with known data. But if you insert an U, that entire bucket of 300
> steps will become unknown.
>
> And if you have more than one RRA in your RRD, you can do the same. For
> instance:
>
> other RRA:
> X-Files Factor: 0,0
> amount of PDPs per CDP: 86400
>
> This will show one day per pixel column. Show an entire year of such data
> and you see instantly how well you're doing: visible data means days
> without
> any interuption.
>
>
> Does this help?
>
> cheers,
> Alex
>
Hello Alex,
this is exactly what I want!
Only your last point doesn't fit, but that's negligible.
Just for your interest, we store rrd-data for every minute without any
aggregation for 400 days.
And we make our SLAs just over 1 year, using the not-aggregated
every-minute-values.
Cheers!
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Additional-%22Unknown%22-Value-tp3042052p3055162.html
Sent from the RRDtool Users Mailinglist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the rrd-users
mailing list