[smokeping-users] 1.x vs 2.x performance drop?
Scott Moseman
scmoseman at gmail.com
Wed Nov 14 20:38:27 CET 2007
With SpeedyCGI we're still seeing a fairly slower response from the
2.x installation. Now we're talking about maybe 5-6 secs instead of
the 12+ secs, but the 1.x installation can still do it in about 2
secs. Is there anything else I can check out or try?
Thanks,
Scott
On Nov 14, 2007 9:51 AM, Scott Moseman <scmoseman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> "This script runs with normal perl. BUT it will appear to be very
> slow, because it does a lot of things when starting up. So if the
> script has to be started a fresh on every click, this is both slow and
> a tough thing for your webserver. I therefore strongly recomment using
> SpeedyCGI."
>
> Perhaps that is my problem. I guess I shall investigate using SpeedyCGI now.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
>
> On Nov 14, 2007 9:23 AM, Scott Moseman <scmoseman at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > We have had a 1.34 installation running forever now. I'm tinkering
> > with 2.2.7 (on the same server). I setup all of the out-of-the-box
> > options to get 2.2.7 running and moved over the "meat" of the config
> > file from my 1.34 installation, so it would be polling and displaying
> > the same devices. The web interface on 2.x seems incredibly slow.
> > For instance, when pulling up a category with 10 devices, it takes 2
> > secs to see it in 1.34 -- but it takes 12+ secs in my 2.2.7. What's
> > up with that? 1.34 is using rrdtool 1.0.33 and 2.2.7 is using rrdtool
> > 1.2.24, in case that matters.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Scott
> >
>
More information about the smokeping-users
mailing list