[smokeping-users] Something Odd With This These Graphs: http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping-demo/?target=Customers.OP.johan
bodycare_5 at live.com
Fri Oct 7 08:35:42 CEST 2011
Actually I came across this inconsistency when I was looking for packet loss trending of datacenters. See below (without background coloring):
Packet loss is 0.06% yet there is no single green dot in this graph!
If you have something different, post plz.
From: jjackson at aninetworks.net
To: bodycare_5 at live.com; ktdreyer at ktdreyer.com; smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 05:24:11 -0700
Subject: RE: [smokeping-users] Something Odd With This These Graphs: http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping-demo/?target=Customers.OP.johan
My 400 days graphs do not look like Tobi’s demo graphs. It might be something configured differently on his demo site.
From: smokeping-users-bounces+jjackson=aninetworks.net at lists.oetiker.ch [mailto:smokeping-users-bounces+jjackson=aninetworks.net at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Jenny Lee
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 10:34 PM
To: ktdreyer at ktdreyer.com; smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: Re: [smokeping-users] Something Odd With This These Graphs: http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping-demo/?target=Customers.OP.johan
> On 10/5/2011 3:05 AM, Jenny Lee wrote:
> > SpeedyCGI requirement was still there in 2011 even though last version of
> > that software was abandoned 9 years ago! It is still coming with the Fedora
> > SmokePing RPM released in 2011.
> Please file a bug with the Fedora project, because this is not a
> problem with Smokeping upstream any more. You may or may not see an
> Smokeping update happen in Fedora 15 or 16, but Fedora rawhide ought
> to be updated to the latest upstream version.
> - Ken
2011/09/25 -- released version 2.5.0 :* Switch from using SpeedyCGI to FastCGI.
Hello there! This software was abandoned in 2003. You expect Fedora to pack it the moment you release it?
I think you all strayed from the point.
The point was that at 400 days: http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping-demo/?target=Customers.OP.johan
Having "0.17% avg packet loss" and covering "96% of the graph surface with packet loss" is just NOT RIGHT. I am just stupefied to see people have been using this like that 10 years and nothing has been done about it. I also found that this issue was brought up twice on the mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the smokeping-users