[mrtg] Does anyone have a 'clue' on what I need to do to get the Processor Load to graph out?

[Robin Burger]

Hello everyone.  I am new here, and have not yet finished going through the
archive so this question may have been answered before...

Does anyone have a 'clue' on what I need to do to get the Processor Load to
graph out?


I am working trying to get MRTG to give me CPU stats...

scully
   - SunOS      5.6
   - mrtg       2.8.6
   - UCD-snmp   4.0.1

iceberg
   - Linux      2.2.5-15
   - UCD-snmp   3.6.1

-=-=-=-=--= iceberg.cfg -=-=-=-=--=  (( this is the '''whole file'''  ))
WorkDir: /export/home/mrtg/data
Target[ICEBERG.wfd.pri.bms.com]:
1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1.2.769&1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1.2.769:public at iceberg
MaxBytes[ICEBERG.wfd.pri.bms.com]: 1250000
Title[ICEBERG.wfd.pri.bms.com]: iceberg (ICEBERG.wfd.pri.bms.com):
hrProcessorLoad
PageTop[ICEBERG.wfd.pri.bms.com]: <H1>Traffic Analysis for hrProcessorLoad
 </H1>
 <TABLE>
   <TR><TD>System:</TD><TD>iceberg in Look behind you</TD></TR>
   <TR><TD>Maintainer:</TD><TD>Greg Stiegler <stiegleg at bms.com> </TD></TR>
   <TR><TD>Interface:</TD><TD>hrProcessorLoad (2)</TD></TR>
   <TR><TD>IP:</TD><TD>ICEBERG.wfd.pri.bms.com (140.176.249.28)</TD></TR>
   <TR><TD>Max Speed:</TD>
       <TD>1250.0 kBytes/s (ethernetCsmacd)</TD></TR>
  </TABLE>
-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^

comment # # (( I have ran the snmpget command directly and I know that the
comment # #    result is returned.  And I know that it is integer ))
comment #
 scully # snmpget -q -f iceberg public
hrDevice.hrProcessorTable.hrProcessorEntry.hrProcessorLoad.769
 .iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.host.hrDevice.hrProcessorTable.hrProcessorEntry.hrProcessorLoad.769
10
   1 . 3 . 6 .    1   . 2  .  1  . 25 .   3    .      3         .
1            .  2            .769
   1.3.6.1.2.1.25.3.3.1.2.769

scully # LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib ; export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
scully # /export/home/src/mrtg/mrtg-2.8.6/run/mrtg.debug
/export/home/mrtg/configs/iceberg.cfg
.
.    ((((( note I modified the DEBUG flag and the lines to see that the
values are being created
.
 - inlast( 2 )
 - outlast( 2 )
 - uptime( 4 days, 9:43:53 )
 - name( iceberg )
 - time( 940020397 )
.
.
.
 << writegraphics - entrance >> 1

 writegraphics: inlast 2 outlast 2
 <><><><><><><><>  check
 /export/home/src/mrtg/mrtg-2.8.6/run//rateup /export/home/mrtg/data/
iceberg.wfd.pri.bms.com 940020397,  ? '-z':'-Z' u 2, 2, 1250000: c#00cc00,
#0000ff #006600, #ff00ff EXEC: /export/home/src/mrtg/mrtg-2.8.6/run//rateup
/export/home/mrtg/data/ iceberg.wfd.pri.bms.com 940020397 -Z u 2 2 1250000 c
#00cc00 #0000ff #006600 #ff00ff k 1000 i iceberg.wfd.pri.bms.com-day.png
-1250000 -1250000 400 100 1 1 0 300 0 4 1 i iceberg.wfd.pri.bms.com-week.png
-1250000 -1250000 400 100 1 1 0 1800 0 4 1 i
iceberg.wfd.pri.bms.com-month.png -1250000 -1250000 400 100 1 1 0 7200 0 4 1
i iceberg.wfd.pri.bms.com-year.png -1250000 -1250000 400 100 1 1 0 86400 0 4
1
.
.
.

And I know 'rateup' is getting the information...  ((note - I like the coding
of rateup, clean!))

 # head /export/home/mrtg/data/iceberg.wfd.pri.bms.com.log
940020397 2 2
940020397 0 0 0 0
939846271 0 0 0 0   (( incorrect... should have updated ))
939846000 0 0 0 0
939845700 0 0 0 0
.
.
.

But each time I run mrtg - ONLY the first line in the log file gets
updated...

'rateup' should be getting the values, and the log file does get them, but
the rest of the file is zeroed out... ?

NOTE:: I use cfgmaker, mrtg, and indexmaker on cisco routers, and ''they
graph out''!  The log file grows, and shows the correct values - just not for
Processor Load... I know that the '.ok' file is not created when I run mrtg
for this file - and I even understand that it is because of the 'newifDescrs'
not being ?returned? because of the command that is being sent out...


  1906            ($in,$out,$uptime,$name,$newifDescrs{$targ}) =
  vs
  1924            ($in,$out,$uptime,$name) =


Does anyone have a 'clue' on what I need to do to get the Processor Load to
graph out?

Clues - direction - and expecially '''answers''' would be greatly
appreciated...

Thank you in advance

Robin

PS - Sorry for the size of the question...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/mrtg/attachments/19991015/bfa656af/attachment.html