[mrtg] Re: Multiple Sub-Interfaces
dhudes at hudes.org
Thu Dec 13 15:12:49 MET 2001
what about frame relay overhead?
You should also be getting info from the FR MIB and match that up
on a per VC basis so you can then have graphs of e.g. IfInOctets vs.
FECN (or BECN).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Troy Arnold" <Tarnold at norwood.com>
To: "MRTG (E-mail)" <mrtg at list.ee.ethz.ch>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 8:21 AM
Subject: [mrtg] Multiple Sub-Interfaces
> I have a Frame Relay network and have many subinterfaces on the router.
> Would it be smart ( and more accurate ) to take all interfaces and add them
> up for each T1 then graph that result orr would it be more useful to watch
> each subinterface and graph that. When graphing a subinterface the reported
> utilazation is a % of the total bandwidth of the T1. If this is so why not
> just graph the T1 as a total of all its subinterfaces?
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
More information about the mrtg