[mrtg] Re: Router appears to drop out, but provider sayes its ok

Nick Earle Nick_Earle at bat.com
Fri Apr 25 16:47:15 MEST 2003


This link currently has a CIR = 3Mb and the Circuit is 4Mb so I've set the MaxBytes and AbsMax values as follows:-

     MaxBytes  384000
     AbsMax    512000

Which I thought would allow enough scope for bursting.

Regards,

Nick Earle



                                                                                                                          
                    Daniel J McDonald                                                                                     
                    <dan.mcdonald at austine       To:     Nick Earle <Nick_Earle at bat.com>                                   
                    nergy.com>                  cc:     (bcc: Nick Earle/London/GB/BAT)                                   
                                                Subject:     Re: [mrtg] Router appears to drop out, but provider sayes    
                    25/04/2003 13:22             its ok                                                                   
                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                          






On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 05:18, Nick Earle wrote:
> I'm using MRTG to monitor around 150 routers.
>
> On a couple of the bigger routers (CIR=4Mb) I'm getting 'dropouts' every 4 hours. The period between dropouts is proportional to the amount of traffic, so if there is more traffic the dropouts appear more frequently. Our network service provider is assuring me that there dropouts are not real!

Do you have maxbytes = CIR, or are you setting maxbytes = PIR?

If Maxbytes=CIR and you burst above CIR, MRTG will assume the
information it received was bogus and will discard it.

If you want to maintain the look of your graphs, you  might try setting
maxbytes=CIR and Absmax=PIR.

>
> I was wondering if this might be caused by counter overflow?
>
not at 4mb/s.  134mb/s, sure, but not 4.

> Does anyone now if there is a setting I can use to handle counter overflows more elegantly?
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick Earle
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE 2495, CNX
Austin Energy





Confidentiality Notice: The information in this document and
attachments is confidential and may also be legally privileged.
It is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Internet
communications are not   secure and therefore British American
Tobacco does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of
this message. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify us
immediately and then delete this document. Do not disclose the
contents of this document to any other person, nor take any copies.
Violation of this notice may be unlawful.


--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi



More information about the mrtg mailing list