[rrd-developers] Re: [patch] gfx/graph fixes for imgformat in

[Jake Brutlag]

> <hint>
> It doesn't seem to be very important to others or else there 
> would actually be some traffic on this list ... </>

I haven't followed this thread that closely, but isn't this debate about
the choice between a less complicated interface (graph command syntax)
and a more flexible interface (that allows complete
control/customization of the graphs)? Now maybe an xml interface could
provide both, but backwards compatibility should be preserved. Maybe
there could be a new function "graphxml" that takes the graph specs as
xml, while the old function continues to act as currently advertised.

Jake

Jake Brutlag
Network Analyst
TV Services -- Network Operations
Microsoft MSN 

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi