[rrd-developers] Re: [patch] gfx/graph fixes for imgformat in

[Tobias Oetiker]

Yesterday Jake Brutlag wrote:

>
> > <hint>
> > It doesn't seem to be very important to others or else there
> > would actually be some traffic on this list ... </>
>
> I haven't followed this thread that closely, but isn't this debate about
> the choice between a less complicated interface (graph command syntax)
> and a more flexible interface (that allows complete
> control/customization of the graphs)? Now maybe an xml interface could
> provide both, but backwards compatibility should be preserved. Maybe
> there could be a new function "graphxml" that takes the graph specs as
> xml, while the old function continues to act as currently advertised.

now that seems like a sensible idea ... :-)

and while doing it we could generalize the code in rrd_graph


tobi
>
> Jake
>
> Jake Brutlag
> Network Analyst
> TV Services -- Network Operations
> Microsoft MSN
>

-- 
 ______    __   _
/_  __/_  / /  (_) Oetiker, ETZ J97, ETH, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
 / // _ \/ _ \/ / phoneto:+41(0)1-632-5286  faxto:+41(0)1-632-1517
/_/ \.__/_.__/_/ oetiker at ee.ethz.ch http://google.com/search?q=tobi


--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi